Campaign For Safe Cosmetics: A New Report #fb #dmibn

A 32-page report entitled "No More Toxic Tub" has been released by the Campaign For Safe Cosmetics. The report purports to show that a large number of cosmetics designed for children contain harmful ingredients. The report is undated so I'm not sure when it was released, but it seems to be quite recent. One of the things the report suggests is that federal laws should be changed to require that cosmetic ingredients and products designed for children should be proven safe through testing before the products are sold.

The report also says that "provisions should be made to support businesses, particularly small businesses, in meeting federal regulations for safer products." While I am encouraged by this statement, its appearance at the bottom of page 22 of the 32-page report is not especially indicative of a commitment to make sure that small businesses are not regulated in the same manner as large ones.

Moreover, while the report asks people to write their Congressional representatives and alert the media about the issue, it does not encourage them to let them know that small businesses are not a part of the overall problem.

I know that some large manufacturers with billions of dollars in annual sales and millions of customers worldwide are using questionable ingredients in their products. This is a problem that the newly introduced FDA Globalization Act of 2009: HR-758 should address. However, and this is important, it is not the small, artisan, Indie and handmade companies that are using these unsafe ingredients and therefore, any new law must be carefully tailored to ensure that small companies are not regulated in the same way that larger ones are.

When I went to Capitol Hill last year with several other members of the Indie Beauty Network (@essentialu, @brambleberry, @ecommercediva and @bellalucce), this is exactly what we urged, and we were successful in removing several troublesome provisions in the draft of the cosmetics law, including annual fees of up to $12,000. We did this in conjunction with the Handcrafted Soap Makers Guild (@soapguild). These victories were fantastic, and they help to make sure that while the public is safe, small business are not decimated.

We must continue the progress we began last year as we work with Congress and others to preserve a level playing field for the small businesses that are such a critical part of the American economy. We must continue to inform everyone we can about the crucial differences between the way huge multi-national cosmetics companies do business and the way Indie Beauty businesses do business.

Some people do not want the new law to pass with any kind of waiver or special consideration for Indies. I am not one of those people.

We have already seen what happened with the CPSIA, the new consumer law which requires that children's toys, clothing and other items be tested for lead before they are sold. Small companies are regulated under this new law in the same way that large companies are. This happened because the law law passed without any consideration for small businesses, many of which are no longer in business because they can't afford to test their products for ingredients they already know those products do not contain.

Let's make sure the same thing does not happen in the cosmetics arena. Cosmetics should contain safe ingredients. We all want that. But companies that are using safe ingredients should not be required to test for ingredients that they know they are not using in the first place. Requiring such pre-market testing would put thousands of small companies out of business without doing anything to protect consumers.

As manufacturers, Indie Beauty Network members are committed to producting quality cosmetics and to providing consumers with safe alternatives to mass marketed products.

I intend to continue to inform legislators, regulators, my colleagues, Indie Beauty Network members, consumers and all stakeholders on this important issue.

What are your thoughts?

  

Readers Comments

cactusandivy 03/12/09
Thanks dM for staying on top of all the issues that will have an impact on the indie business owner. Congress needs to be made aware that we are so different from the "big box" companies. You are a true champion for indies and I am comfortable in knowing you will make sure our voices are heard! Rock on Guniea Chick! Lisa
giftfornoreason 03/12/09
Indeed, the smaller cosmetics makers shouldn't have extreme requirements put on them. It's the big guys that manufacture in China that are going to lobby against this. I know someone who went to China to look into manufacturing there and found out that they couldn't guarantee what ingredients went into their lotions! Even if they were given a particular formula! No wonder most lotions in the big box stores don't label their ingredients, they can't. (I'm looking at you Walmart!)
Herban_Paradise 03/13/09
This report hit Google headlines this morning, and a Washington Post article quotes Sen. Dianne Feinstein (CA) as saying she intends to introduce legislation to require stronger oversight of the cosmetics industry: http://snipurl.com/dqbvl
indiebusiness 03/24/09
This is the Campaign For Safe Cosmetics report that supports the lawsuit.
indiebusiness 03/30/09
The "No More Toxic Tub" report caused Chinese retailers to pull cosmetics off the shelf. http://tinyurl.com/cwv9ou. It could happen here, to any cosmetics manufacturer, large or small. Question: should a privately funded entity have this much power?
indiebusiness 03/30/09
http://tinyurl.com/cwv9ou-"No More Toxic Tub" report causes Chinese retailers to pull cosmetics. Is it good for privately funded entity to have this much power?
brambleberry 04/01/09
A privately funded entity should not have that much power. That's why the FDA exists and while the FDA is having trouble on the food front (though the Peanut recall was a simple case of full-blown fraud), it has an excellent safety record with regards to cosmetics and toiletries. I wonder what the ramifications of using a lotion that has a formaldehyde breakdown in it every day for your entire life VERSUS having an extra 30 pounds around your waist for your entire life is? I'm betting that being overweight has significantly worse health implications than using a lotion that breaks down in formaldehyde in small, infinitesimally minute amounts.
Tweet a CommentNot a Twitter user? Sign-up!

   Cancel / Go Back

About indiebusiness

  • Name dM Coles Johnson
  • Location Charlotte, NC, Washington, DC
  • Web http://www.indieb...
  • Bio Wife. Mom. Indie Beauty Network, Indie Business Podcast. One-time practicing attorney. Award-winning smallbiz advocate. Sponsored = #sp
  RSS

Links to indiebusiness's Profiles

 | 

Walls of indiebusiness's Friends